repomatic.matrix.runner_sync module¶
Keep a repository’s runner images current against what GitHub still offers.
A runs-on: value is the one dependency in a workflow that nothing bumps:
Dependabot rewrites uses: references, sync-workflow-pins rewrites version
literals, and neither touches a runner image. So an image retires on GitHub’s
schedule, entirely outside this repository’s view, and the first sign is a
failing build.
The source is the Available Images table
(repomatic.matrix.runners), compared against the labels this repository
actually runs. Nothing else is read.
Note
Why the table and not the announcement feed
The Announcement-labelled issues of actions/runner-images answer a
different question. The feed reports what changed for anyone; the table
reports what is true for this repository, and only the second decides
anything. A feed reader opens reports about images this repository either
already runs or never will.
Two things are given up, both deliberately. GitHub badges an image
deprecated when deprecation begins rather than when it is announced, so a
retirement surfaces here months later than the feed shows it: for Ubuntu
22.04, September rather than June. What remains is still ample, since the
badge lands well before the image stops working. And a change to the
contents of an image already in use, like a default toolchain moving, is
invisible in the table; the test suite is what catches those.
Caution
An unreadable or restyled table yields an empty catalog, and every caller here
reads that as “propose nothing” rather than “nothing exists”. Failing closed
costs a cycle of not noticing; failing open would rewrite a runs-on: to an
image GitHub does not host, taking every job with it.
- repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.AXES_SOURCE_PATH: Final = PosixPath('repomatic/matrix/axes.py')¶
Where the curated test axes live, relative to the root of a repomatic checkout.
Derived from the module name, so the path follows the module if it moves. Only a checkout of
kdeldycke/repomaticitself holds this file: a repository consuming repomatic inherits the axes through its pin.
- repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.RUNS_ON_RE_TEMPLATE = '(?P<prefix>^[ \\t]*runs-on:[ \\t]*)(?P<quote>[\'\\"]?){label}(?P=quote)[ \\t]*$'¶
A literal
runs-on:naming one label, anchored to its own line.Rewritten as raw text rather than through a YAML round-trip, for the reason
repomatic.github.workflow_sync._extract_raw_jobgives: a round-trip reformats the whole file, and a runner bump should read as a one-line diff. The optional quote group is carried through so a quoted value stays quoted.
- repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.AXIS_LABEL_RE_TEMPLATE = '(?P<quote>["\\\']){label}(?P=quote)'¶
A runner label as a quoted string literal in the curated axes.
Rewritten as text for the same reason a
runs-on:is: the axes are a hand-kept tuple carrying comments and an ordering that says which runner is the fast one, and rebuilding the module from an AST would discard both.
- class repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.ChangeKind(*values)[source]¶
Bases:
StrEnumWhy the table justifies moving a label.
- RETIREMENT = 'retirement'¶
The image is badged deprecated: jobs on it carry an end date.
- UPGRADE = 'upgrade'¶
A strictly newer version of the image exists.
- class repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.RunnerChange(kind, label, successor, locations, reason, alternative, probe=False)[source]¶
Bases:
objectOne runner-image edit the available-images table justifies.
- kind: ChangeKind¶
Whether the current image is going away, or has a newer version.
- locations: tuple[str, ...]¶
file.yaml:job-identries whose literalruns-on:nameslabel.Rewritten onto
successorfor either kind. A retirement moves them because the image is going away; an upgrade because nothing else ever will, a literal being the oneruns-on:no probe can reach.
- alternative: str¶
A newer preview passed over in favour of a released successor.
Reported, never taken. Whether a fresher preview beats a released image is a capacity judgement, and the pull request exists to host exactly that.
- probe: bool = False¶
Whether the test matrix gains a
continue-on-errorcell onsuccessor.An upgrade sets this only when the fleet does not run the successor yet. Probing one it already runs writes an
unstableentry marking every cell on that imagecontinue-on-error, so a single job left behind would stop the current image from gating the build.
- apply(workflow_dir, pyproject_path, axes_path=None)[source]¶
Make this change in the working tree.
Both kinds move the jobs naming the image outright. A retirement also moves the curated axes, when axes_path names them. An upgrade also adds its matrix probe.
- Parameters:
workflow_dir (
Path) – Directory holding the workflow files.pyproject_path (
Path) – The project file an upgrade probe lands in.axes_path (
Path|None) – The curated axes module, set only inside a checkout of repomatic itself (seeAXES_SOURCE_PATH).
- Return type:
- Returns:
The files actually rewritten.
- rewrite_literals(workflow_dir)[source]¶
Rewrite every literal
runs-on:naming the label being moved off.Serves both kinds. A retirement rewrites because the image is going away; an upgrade rewrites because a literal is the one
runs-on:a matrix probe cannot reach, so without this it sits on its image until a retirement forces the move, at the moment there is least runway to handle a break.Caution
An upgrade rewrite is a bet rather than an experiment: a job has one image, so there is no
continue-on-errorhalf to fall back on. The pull request is where that bet is taken or declined, and its own CI run is the evidence only for a job the pull request actually runs. A workflow triggered byscheduleorworkflow_dispatchalone shows nothing on the proposal, so read the diff for those rather than the checkmark.Idempotent: a file already on the successor matches nothing and is left untouched, so a re-run after a merge is a no-op rather than a second edit.
- rewrite_axes(axes_path)[source]¶
Move a retiring label forward in the curated test-matrix axes.
Only meaningful inside
kdeldycke/repomatic, where the axes live. A repository consuming repomatic inherits them through the pin, so its matrix moves when it adopts a release rather than when it edits anything.This is the highest-blast-radius edit the operation makes: every downstream repository picks these axes up at the next release. That is the argument for proposing it in a pull request whose own CI runs the full matrix on the new image, rather than for not proposing it.
- add_probe(pyproject_path)[source]¶
Add the successor to the full test matrix as a failing-allowed probe.
Writes two keys under
[tool.repomatic.test-matrix]: the label joins theosaxis throughvariations, and anunstableentry marks every cell carrying itcontinue-on-error. Both are needed and neither alone is useful: the variation without the unstable entry gates the build on an image nobody has vetted, and the unstable entry without the variation matches nothing.Idempotent: an image already probed is detected in both keys and nothing is written.
- repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.plan_runner_changes(literal, tracked, catalog, ignore=())[source]¶
Work out which runner-image edits the table justifies.
Every label this repository runs is looked up in the table, and yields at most one change:
Retirement. The row is badged deprecated. Jobs naming the image outright move to the pick of
successor_for().Upgrade. A strictly newer version exists. Jobs naming the old image outright move onto it, and the matrix gains it as a
continue-on-errorprobe, so nothing is bet on it there while the suite starts exercising it. The probe half is dropped when the fleet already runs the successor, perRunnerChange.probe; the rewrite half is what moves a job no probe can reach.
A label absent from the table is skipped, with no change: the image is already gone, and
actionlintfails the Lint workflow on an unknown label.Only literal
runs-on:values are rewritten, for either kind: one built from an expression draws on a matrix axis, which is the axis owner’s to move.Strictly newer by version is what separates an upgrade from a flavour.
Windows 11 Arm64 with Visual Studio 2026sits at the same version asWindows 11 Arm64: a different toolchain, not a newer image, and proposing it as an upgrade would be wrong.- Parameters:
literal (
Mapping[str,Sequence[str]]) – Labels named outright in workflows, mapped to their locations, asliteral_runners()reports them.tracked (
Iterable[str]) – Every image this repository has a stake in.catalog (
RunnerCatalog) – Parsed available-images table.ignore (
Iterable[str]) – Labels the repository has declined. Async-*job regenerates on every run, so without this a closed pull request comes back and the proposal becomes a nuisance rather than a service.
- Return type:
- Returns:
The changes to propose, retirements first.
- repomatic.matrix.runner_sync.render_change_table(changes)[source]¶
Render proposed changes as a Markdown table for a pull request body.
Carries the reasoning rather than just the edit: the diff shows what moved, and what a reviewer cannot see there is why the table says it had to, which jobs are affected, and what was passed over.
- Parameters:
changes (
Sequence[RunnerChange]) – Changes fromplan_runner_changes().- Return type:
- Returns:
A GitHub-flavored Markdown table, newline-terminated.